DTG Plus DRV /Cobicistat in Treatment Experienced Resistant HIV-1-Infected Patients

calendar
27 May, 24

 

Introduction

In extensively treatment experienced and multidrug resistant HIV-1 patients, maintaining lifelong HIV-1 suppression is crucial thus there is need for simple, effective, and well-tolerated antiretroviral therapy (ART) combinations. Darunavir (DRV) boosted with ritonavir (DRV/r) or cobicistat (DRV/c) and dolutegravir (DTG) have demonstrated efficacy in patients with limited therapeutic options.

Aim

To evaluate  efficacy and safety of DTG plus DRV/c as a once-daily maintenance strategy vs continuing the previous ART in patients who were highly treatment experienced with HIV-1 resistant to drugs but not integrase inhibitors (INSTIs) or DRV

Patient profile

  • HIV-infected adultswith confirmed HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL for >6 months
  • Prior treatment with at least 3 antiretroviral drugs
  • History of drug resistance mutations against at least 2 antiretroviral classes but remaining fully susceptible to DRV and integrase inhibitors

Methods

  • Randomized, open label, noninferiority, multicentre study.

  • The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA 50 copies/mL at week 48 relative to time to loss of virologic response, with a noninferiority margin set at -12.5%
  • Virologic failure was defined as confirmed HIV-1 RNA >50 copies/mL or a single determination of HIV-1 RNA >50 copies/mL followed by antiretroviral therapy discontinuation.

Results

  • No significant differences in virologic efficacy in the Time to loss of virologic response (TLOVR) or FDA snapshot analyses

    Figure 1 Virological outcomes at week 48 as per TLOVR or FDA snapshot analysis

  • In SOC group, 2 virologic failures vs none was observed in the 2D group.
  • Three and 5 participants in the 2D and SOC groups experienced blips during the follow-up period (P=.480)
  • At 48 weeks, mean ART adherence was similar between groups (100% in the 2D group vs 99.6% in the SOC group, P= .334)
  • At week 48, median CD4+ change from baseline in cell/mm3 count was -1.0 cells/mm3 in the 2D arm and 0.4 cells/mm3 in the SOC arm (P=.130)

Table 1: Mean changes in Lipids, Creatinine

 

SOC group (Control; n = 44)

2D group (DRV/c + DTG; n = 45)

P Value

Cholesterol, mg/dL

Baseline

Week 48

P-valuea

Baseline

Week 48

P-valuea

Baseline

Week 48

Total

198.0

 

205.8

 

.530

194.6

 

200.0

 

.560

.510

.429

LDL

128.0

 

126.3

 

.498

119.0

 

119.0

 

.660

.323

.511

HDL

47.0

 

44.4

 

.120

47.3

 

48.3

 

.424

.826

.429

Triglycerides, mg/dL

133.0

 

152.0

 

.236

125.7

 

136.0

 

.666

.743

.233

Creatinine, mg/dL

0.86

 

0.90

 

.355

0.90

 

0.99

 

.003

.582

.176

CKD-EPI, mL/min

80.0

 

74.1

 

.414

76.3

 

76.0

 

.012

0.370

.927

 

  • At least 1 adverse event was reported in 91.1% in 2 D group vs 72.7% in SOC group.
  • In 2D arm, a total of 111 adverse events were reportedvs 81 in the SOC arm (P= .002)
  • No serious adverse events, AIDS-defining events, or deaths were reported during the study.

Conclusion

  • In highly treatment experienced patients with resistance to at least 2 antiretroviral classes but fully active DRV and INSTIs, dual therapy with DRV/c plus DTG maintains viral suppression in patients who are well suppressed and adherent to ART.
  • DRV/c plus DTG may be considered a once-daily therapy option only for well-selected patients.

Reference

Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Oct 31;10(11):ofad542

Related Topics