CANVAS Program: Impact of Canagliflozin on Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Type-2 Diabetes Patients

calendar
1 Sep, 20

Background

Type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients are burdened with a substantial risk of cardiovascular (CV) and renal disease. Canagliflozin, a sodium–glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor reduces glycemia along with a reduction in blood pressure and body weight in type 2 diabetes patients. Canagliflozin also has a favorable impact on intra-renal hemodynamics and albuminuria.

Aim

The CANVAS (The Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study) Program (an integrated analysis of CANVAS and CANVAS-Renal [CANVAS-R] studies) aimed at evaluating the impact of canagliflozin treatment on CV, renal, and safety outcomes in T2DM patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease.

Patient Profile

  • Adults with T2DM (glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c]; ≥7% to ≤10.5%) and at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD)
  • Patients aged ≥30 years with a history of symptomatic CVD or those aged ≥50 years with at least two of the following CVD risk factors:
    • Duration of diabetes ≥10 years
    • Systolic blood pressure (SBP) >140 mm Hg while receiving ≥1 antihypertensive agents
    • Current smoking
    • Microalbuminuria or macroalbuminuria,
    • High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) level <38.7 mg/dL (1 mmol/L)
  • Baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >30 ml/min/1.73 m2 of body surface area.

Methods

Study Design

  • Randomized double-blind study with a 2-week placebo run-in phase

Treatment Strategy

  • Participants from CANVAS study were randomized in 1:1:1 ratio and those from the CANVAS-R in 1:1 ratio to receive canagliflozin or placebo

Follow-Up

  • CANVAS Program - mean follow-up: 188.2 weeks
    • CANVAS – mean follow up: 295.9 weeks
    • CANVAS-R – mean follow up: 108 weeks

Outcomes

Primary Outcome

  • A composite of death from CV causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), or nonfatal stroke

Secondary Outcomes

  • Death from any cause
  • Death from CV causes
  • Progression of albuminuria (defined as: a >30% increase in albuminuria and a change from either normoalbuminuria to microalbuminuria/ macroalbuminuria or from microalbuminuria to macroalbuminuria
  • The composite of death from CV causes and hospitalization for heart failure

Exploratory Outcomes

Prespecified Cardiovascular Outcomes

  • Nonfatal MI
  • Nonfatal stroke and
  • Hospitalization for heart failure

Prespecified Renal Outcomes

  • Regression of albuminuria, and the renal composite comprising a 40% reduction in eGFR sustained for at least two consecutive measures, the need for renal-replacement therapy (dialysis or transplantation), or death from renal causes

Safety Analysis

  • Any adverse events

Results

  • A total of 96% (n=9734) individuals completed the trial. The mean age of the study subjects was 63.3 years and 35.8% were women. The mean duration of diabetes was 13.5 years, and 65.6% subjects had a history of cardiovascular disease CVD at baseline.
  • The incidence of primary outcome was significantly lower in the canagliflozin group vs. the placebo group; a 14% risk reduction in the primary outcome was observed with canagliflozin vs placebo (P<0.001 for noninferiority, P=0.0158 for superiority (Table1)
  • The reductions in incidence of fatal secondary outcome including death from any cause, and death from CV causes was statistically non-significant in both the study groups
  • Canagliflozin demonstrated a 33% significant reduction in hospitalization due to heart failure as well as a 22% reduction in a composite outcome of CV death or hospitalization due to heart failure
  • A 27% reduction in progression of albuminuria and a 70% increase in regression of albuminuria was observed with canagliflozin-treated patients vs. the placebo-treated patients.
  • The incidence of renal composite outcome comprising of sustained 40% reduction in eGFR, the need for renal-replacement therapy, or death from renal causes was less frequent in the canagliflozin group vs. the placebo group; a 40% reduction was observed with canagliflozin vs. placebo for this composite outcome (Table 1)
Table 1: Effects of canagliflozin on cardiovascular and renal outcomes

Outcome

Annualized incidence (participants per 1000 patient-years)

Hazard Ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval

Risk Reduction (RR)

Canagliflozin group

Placebo group

Primary Outcome*

26.9

31.5

0.86

(0.75 – 0.97)

14%

Hospitalization due to heart failure

5.5

8.7

0.67

(0.52 – 0.87)

33%

CV Death or hospitalization due to heart failure

16.3

20.8

0.78

(0.67 – 0.91)

22%

Renal composite outcome^

5.5

9.0

0.60

(0.47 – 0.77)

40%

*Composite of CV death, nonfatal MI or nonfatal stroke; ^Composite of 40% reduction in eGFR, renal replacement therapy, or renal death

  • Dose of canagliflozin was increased to 300 mg in 71.4% of CANVAS-R participants. All study subjects were treated appropriately with other medications for glycemic control and CV risk.
  • The use of other antidiabetic medications during follow-up was 9.3% lower in the group treated with canagliflozin vs. group receiving placebo.
  • Over the entire follow-up period, canagliflozin demonstrated greater HbA1c (-0.58%), body weight (-1.6 kg) and SBP (-3.93 mm Hg) reductions compared to placebo (P<0.001 for all comparisons)
  • Canagliflozin-treated patients had an increase in HDL-C (2.05 mg/dL) as well as LDL-C (4.68 mg/dL) vs. placebo group. However, the LDL-C to HDL-C ratio remained unchanged
  • The incidence of serious adverse events was less frequent in the canagliflozin group vs. placebo group (104.3 vs. 120.0 participants with an event per 1000 patient-years; HR 0.93)
  • A higher risk of amputation, although of very low incidence (6.3 vs. 3.4 participants with amputation per 1000 patient-years; HR 1.97) was observed with canagliflozin compared to placebo. Majority of the amputations (71%) occurred at the level of the toe or metatarsal. The highest absolute risk of amputation was observed in patients with a history of amputation or peripheral arterial disease, but relative risk with canagliflozin vs. placebo was similar across these subgroups.
  • Canagliflozin did not increase the risk of hypoglycemia, hyperkalemia, acute kidney injury, pancreatitis, malignancies, or venous thromboembolism vs. placebo
  • The incidence of all fractures was higher in the canagliflozin group vs. the placebo group (15.4 vs. 11.9 participants with fracture per 1000 patient-years; HR 1.26). A similar trend was observed for low-trauma fractures events as well (11.6 vs. 9.2 participants with fracture per 1000 patient-years; HR 1.23 non-significant). Further, low-trauma fracture incidence was higher in canagliflozin group vs. placebo in CANVAS but not in CANVAS-R.
  • The incidence of ketoacidosis was less frequent in both, canagliflozin and placebo groups (0.6 vs. 0.3 participants with an event per 1000 patient years; HR 2.23)

Conclusions

  • When added to the current standard of care, canagliflozin further lowered the risk of CV events in T2DM patients at high risk of CVD
  • Canagliflozin also demonstrated reduction in renal outcomes
  • Canagliflozin treatment was associated with a higher risk of amputation, although of very low incidence, compared to current standard of care

N Engl J Med. 2017; 377: 644 - 57