Better Efficacy and Safety of Ceftazidime–Avibactam versus Polymyxins in Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infection

calendar
27 Nov, 23

Introduction

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) is increasingly recognised as a significant public health concern. Recently, polymyxins were reintroduced into medical practice as one of the last resorts for treating extensively drug-resistant gram-negative bacteria. Also, a meta-analysis demonstrated that ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) might be an option for empirical therapy of CRE infection.

Aim

To conduct a meta-analysis to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI relative to polymyxins in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections.

Patient Profile

  • 1111 patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections

    Method

    Study Design

    Endpoints

    Results

    Efficacy

  • CAZ-AVI treatment groups demonstrated a significantly lower 30-day mortality compared with polymyxins groups (risk ratio, RR 0.48, I2=10%, p<0.0001) in nine studies (n=766) in patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections
  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of seven retrospective and four prospective cohort studies
  • Eligible studies included all available published studies that compared CAZ-AVI with polymyxins for the treatment of CRE infections in adult patients (>18 years)
  • CAZ-AVI or polymyxins-based combined administration schemes were included
  • Mortality, clinical success, microbiological eradication and nephrotoxicity
  • CAZ-AVI treatment groups showed higher clinical success versus polymyxins groups (RR 1.71, I2=35%, p<0.0001) in four studies (n=463)
  • No significant difference was observed in microbiological eradication rates with CAZ-AVI or polymyxins (RR 1.16, I2=0, p>0.05) in two studies (n=249;)
  • All included studies had low risk of bias (Newcastle–Ottawa Scale scores 7 [graded as high quality])

 

Figure 1: Effect of ceftazidime-avibactam and polymyxins on outcomes

Safety 

  • Lower nephrotoxicity was seen in CAZ-AVI treatment groups compared with polymyxins (RR 0.42, I2=35%, p<0.05) in seven studies (n=696)

    Conclusion

  • CAZ-AVI treatment was superior with respect to efficacy and safety compared with polymyxins in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections
  • This is the first of its kind meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI with polymyxins in treating CRE infection

 

BMJ Open 2023; 13(5): e070491