5-Year Efficacy and Safety Results of TCZ Monotherapy in Patients Who Were Part of the AMBITION Study
Introduction
AMBITION (Actemra versus Methotrexate double-blind Investigative Trial In mONotherapy) was a 24-week, randomized controlled trial in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were either methotrexate (MTX)-naive or MTX-free. The study showed the clinical efficacy and superiority of a biologic monotherapy compared with MTX monotherapy for typical MTX dosing regimens
Aim
To report long-term efficacy and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) monotherapy in patients who were part of the AMBITION study
Patient Profile
Patients with active RA who were methotrexate- and biologic-naive or free
of methotrexate for 6 Months
Methods
LTE= longterm extension study ;TCZ=tocilizumab;MTX=methotrexate
* patients at Week 24 who achieved ≥ 50% improvement from baseline in the tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) at weeks 20 and 24 could opt to continue their current blinded treatment in a transition phase until the last patient from AMBITION completed the 24-week core study, or they could move into the LTE study at any time during the transition phase if ≥ 50% improvement in active TJC and SJC was not maintained
- Efficacy assessments included the Disease Activity Score at 28 joints (DAS28), American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 responses, Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI).
- Remission was defined as DAS28 < 2.6, SDAI ≤ 3.3, or CDAI ≤ 2.8.
Results
|
Demographic |
TCZ Monotherapy, n = 134 |
|
|
Age, yrs |
51.1 (12.3) |
|
|
Female, n (%) |
111 (82.8) |
|
|
Baseline oral corticosteroid use, n (%) |
60 (44.8) |
|
|
No. previous DMARD |
0.9 (1.0) |
|
|
No. previous anti-TNF |
0.1 (0.3) |
|
|
RA duration, yrs |
5.9 (7.4) |
|
|
CRP, mg/dl |
3.0 (3.3) |
|
|
ESR, mm/h |
51.3 (26.0) |
|
|
TJC68 |
32.3 (14.3) |
|
|
SJC66 |
18.7 (9.9) |
|
|
VAS PtGA, mm* |
62.5 (19.2) |
|
|
DAS28* |
6.8 (0.9) |
RA: rheumatoid arthritis; CRP: C-reactive protein; ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate; TJC68: tender joint count at 68 joints; SJC66: swollen joint count at 66 joints; VAS: visual analogue scale; PtGA: patient’s global assessment; DAS28: Disease Activity Score at 28 joints
- Clinical efficacy and superiority of a biologic monotherapy compared with MTX monotherapy for typical MTX dosing regimens
- The 5-year efficacy results confirm the continued effectiveness and safety of TCZ as monotherapy
- The risk for serious infections remained stable over time in the AMBITION LTE
- No new safety signals were reported
Conclusion
- In AMBITION study, 264 weeks of TCZ therapy showed the continuing efficacy and safety that was consistent with the efficacy and safety results of 7 other TCZ monotherapy studies
- The findings suggested a sustained effect even without MTX
- TCZ monotherapy for long-term treatment of RA is an important option for patients who are unable to tolerate MTX or for whom MTX is otherwise inappropriate
Reference
J Rheumatol 2017; 44:142–6








