Ibuprofen for Initial Symptomatic Treatment of Uncomplicated UTI
calendar
27 Jun, 19

Introduction

Uncomplicated urinary tract infections are common in general practice, where they account for 25% of antibiotic prescriptions. The alternative symptomatic treatment approach and to what extent it can reduce the overall antibiotic prescription rate is unknown. Ibuprofen has demonstrated non-inferiority for symptom resolution, with 24/36 women recovering without antibiotic treatment in a study that was inadequately powered for a definitive result.

Aim

To assess whether the number of antibiotic prescriptions issued for uncomplicated urinary tract infection can be reduced by symptomatic treatment with ibuprofen.

Patient Profile

  • N= 1184 women with suspected urinary tract infection were screened
  • Women aged 18-65 with typical symptoms of UTI and without risk factors or complications
  • Dysuria and/or frequency/urgency of micturition
  • With or without lower abdominal pain
  • Any signs of upper urinary tract infection (fever, loin tenderness)
  • Current conditions that could increase the likelihood of potentially complicated courses (such as pregnancy or renal diseases)
  • Urinary tract infection within the past two weeks
  • Urinary catheterisation
Table 1: Baseline characteristics of women with uncomplicated urinary tract infection randomised to ibuprofen or fosfomycin.

 

Ibuprofen (n=241)

Fosfomycin (n=243)

Mean (SD) age (years)

37.3 (14.6)

37.3 (14.3)

Median (IQR) age (years)

36.0 (24.0-50.0)

34.0 (24.0-49.0)

Duration of symptoms at inclusion (days)*:

 

 

<1

50 (21)

49 (21)

1-2

104 (43)

80 (34)

>2-7

66 (27)

82 (34)

>7

21 (9)

28 (12)

Symptoms at inclusion*:

 

 

Dysuria

224 (93)

218 (91)

Frequency/urgency

231 (96)

232 (97)

Low abdominal pain

172 (71)

169 (71)

Mean (SD) symptom severity sum score

6.0 (2.2)

6.1 (2.5)

Median (IQR) symptom severity sum score

6.0 (4.0-8.0)

6.0 (4.0-8.0)

Mean (SD) dysuria score

2.3 (1.0)

2.3 (1.1)

Median (IQR) dysuria score

3.0 (2.0-3.0)

2.0 (1.0-3.0)

Mean (SD) frequency/urgency score

2.4 (1.1)

2.4 (1.1)

Median (IQR) frequency/urgency score

2.0 (2.0-3.0)

2.0 (2.0-3.0)

Mean (SD) low abdominal pain score

1.3 (1.1)

1.4 (1.1)

Median (IQR) low abdominal pain score

1.0 (0.0-2.0)

1.0 (0.0-2.0)

Recurrent UT

42 (17)

54 (23)

Mean (SD) activity impairment score

9.6 (5)

8.9 (6)

Dipstick results**:

 

 

Leukocytes positive

205 (85)

200 (83)

Erythrocytes positive

180 (75)

189 (78)

Nitrite positive

53 (22)

46 (19)

Culture results:

 

 

Urine culture positive††

179/237 (76)

181/234 (77)

E coli

143/179 (80)

142/181 (79)

Proteus mirabilis

12/179 (7)

8/181 (4)

Staphylococcus saprophyticus

8/179 (5)

8/181 (4)

Enterococcus faecalis

3/179 (2)

8/181 (4)

Streptococcus agalactiae

0/179 (0)

2/181 (1)

Klebsiella pneumoniae

3/179 (2)

1/181 (1)

Other uropathogens

10/179 (6)

9/181 (5)

Not specified

0/179 (0)

3/181 (2)

Susceptibility to fosfomycin (rate):

 

 

All uropathogens

168/181 (93)

162/177 (92)

E coli

142/143 (99)

142/142 (100)

SD=standard deviation; IQR=interquartile range; UTI=urinary tract infection.

*n=239 in fosfomycin group.

†Range 0-12. Sum of daily symptom sum scores of dysuria, frequency/urgency of micturition, and low abdominal pain, each on a five-point scale from 0

(not at all) to 4 (very strong/frequent).

‡Range 0-4

§UTI within the past year.

¶Activity impairment assessment, sum score range 0-20.

**n=242 in fosfomycin group.

††Bacterial count >102 cfu/mL.

Methods

  • A double-blind randomized multicentre comparative effectiveness trial
  • Patients were randomly assigned to the treatment or control groups
  • Computerized random number generator was used to carry out randomization in blocks of six in a 3:3 ratio

276191

Study Drug

  • Ibuprofen tablets (3×400 mg daily for three days plus 1×1 sachet placebo granules)
  • Fosfomycin- trometamol (1×3 g sachet plus 3×3 placebo tablets for three days)

Endpoints

Primary endpoint

  • The total number of courses of antibiotics on days 0-28 (for urinary tract infection or other conditions)
  • The burden of symptoms on days 0-7, measured as the area under the curve of the sums of daily symptom scores
    • The symptom score included dysuria, frequency/urgency of micturition, and low abdominal pain, each on a five-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (strong/frequent)

Secondary outcomes

  • The numbers of severe adverse events, complications (febrile urinary tract infection, pyelonephritis, septic syndrome)
  • All adverse events, relapses (recurrent urinary tract infection after initial resolution of symptoms) up to day 28 and within six and 12 months,7 and women without symptoms at days four and seven (defined as a symptom sum score of 0)
  • Symptom load until day four and symptom load with regard to specific symptoms until day seven
  • Assessment of activity impairment on days 1-7
  • The number of daily defined doses of antibiotics per patient

Results

  • Initial symptomatic treatment with ibuprofen reduced the overall number of antibiotic treatment courses in women with uncomplicated urinary tract infection by 67%, compared with immediate antibiotic treatment with fosfomycin
    • Significantly more women received prescriptions of antibiotics in the follow-up period (21.2%), the total number receiving antibiotics was lower in the ibuprofen group by 64.7%
Table: Primary and key secondary outcomes in women with uncomplicated urinary tract infection randomised to ibuprofen or fosfomycin

 

Ibuprofen (n=241)

n(%)

Fosfomycin (n=243)

n(%)  

P value

Primary endpoints

 

 

 

Women who received antibiotics:

 

 

 

Total

85 (35)

243 (100)

<0.001

By randomisation

0 (0)

243 (100)

-

During follow-up (all)*

85 (35)

34 (14)

<0.001

During follow-up (for UTI)

75 (31)

30 (12)

<0.001

Mean (SD) symptom burden day 0-7†

17.3 (11.0)

12.1 (8.2)

<0.001

Secondary endpoints

 

 

 

Adverse events in patients:

 

 

 

Patients reporting serious adverse events‡

4 (2)

0 (0)

0.06

Serious adverse events probably drug related

1 (0.4)

0 (0)

0.32

Patients reporting adverse events‡

42 (17)

57 (24)

0.12

Relapses/complications:

 

 

 

All recurrent UTI until day 28

27 (11)

34 (14)

0.41

Early relapse of symptoms (up to day 14)§

13 (5)

7 (3)

0.18

Recurrence of UTI (day 15-28)§

14 (6)

27 (11)

0.049

Pyelonephritis§

5 (2)

1 (0.4)

0.12

Febrile UTI/ (day 0-7)§

3 (1)

0

0.12

Worsening symptoms (day 0-7)§

8 (3)

5 (2)

0.42

Patients without symptoms day 4§

91/234 (39)

129/229 (56)

<0.001

Patients without symptoms day 7¶

163/232 (70)

186/227 (82)

0.004

Mean (SD) symptom duration after randomisation (days)

5.6 (2.2)

4.6 (2.2)

<0.001

Mean (SD) symptom burden day 0-4†

13.1 (7.1)

10.1 (5.9)

<0.001

Mean (SD) symptom burden with regard to dysuria day 0-7

6.8 (4.6)

4.5 (3.6)

<0.001

Mean (SD) symptom burden with regard to frequency/urgency day 0-7

6.5 (4.1)

4.6 (3.4)

<0.001

Mean (SD) symptom burden with regard to low abdominal pain day 0-7

4.1 (4.3)

2.9 (3.1)

0.001

Mean (SD) activity impairment assessment day 0-7

30.3 (24.5)

19.5 (16.7)

<0.001

SD=standard deviation; UTI=urinary tract infection.

*Including antibiotic prescriptions for other reasons—for instance, acute bronchitis, otitis.

†Defined as the area under curve (AUC) of daily symptom sum scores day 0-7.

‡As rated by patients.

§As rated by general practitioners.

¶Symptom free is defined as symptom sum score=0.

  • The total symptom burden (area under the curve) observed on days 0-4 in the ibuprofen group was significantly higher than in the fosfomycin group.
  • Women in the ibuprofen group showed slightly higher scores in impairment of activity
    • On day seven, 2% of the women overall still felt impaired most or all the time
  • A subgroup analysis stratified for urine culture results in the ibuprofen group showed significant differences in both co-primary outcomes
    • women with negative results showed significantly lower symptom burden
    • antibiotic use was significantly more reduced in women with positive culture results
  • The overall rates of adverse events were comparably low in both groups
    • Four serious adverse events occurred that lead to hospital referrals one of these was potentially related to the trial drug
  • There were more cases of pyelonephritis in the ibuprofen group, and the same trend was observed in worsening symptoms, febrile urinary tract infections, and symptoms of early relapse (up to day 14)
    • The pyelonephritis rate in the ibuprofen group was comparably high (2.1%)

Conclusion

  • The hypothesis of non-inferiority of ibuprofen initial symptomatic treatment with was rejected 
  • Significant reduction in antibiotic use was observed with initial treatment with ibuprofen in women aged 18-65 with mild to moderate symptoms of urinary tract infection but was less effective for symptom relief, and there were more cases of pyelonephritis
  • Based on the findings the study authors recommend that this treatment regimen can be discussed with women who are willing to avoid antibiotics or to accept a delayed prescription rather than to all those with an uncomplicated UTI.

BMJ 2015;351:h6544