Effect of 6 years versus 9 years of Zoledronic acid Treatment in Osteoporosis

calendar
18 Jan, 16

Background

The first 3-year extension of HORIZON-PFT (E1) showed that the continuation of zoledronic treatment from 3-6 years resulted in maintenance of Bone Mineral Density (BMD), a decrease in morphometric vertebral fractures and a modest reduction in bone turnover markers (BTMs) vs. discontinuation with nevidence of difference in the incidence of non-vertebral fracture.

Aim

Tassess the efficacy and safety, and need for continued treatment with Zoledronic acid, for 9 years (3 year extension of the HORIZONPFT-E2).

Materials and Methods

  • This was a 3-year, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, second extension (E2) study of the HORIZON-PFT.
  • Women whhad received at least the first and third doses of zoledronic acid in E1 and completed the E1 study were eligible.
  • N= 190 women were randomized treceive either zoledronic acid or placebfor 3 additional years.
  • Z9 group, n=95 women receiving once yearly 5mg IV infusion of zoledronic acid for 3 years.
  • Z6P3 group, n= 95 women receiving placebfor 3 years.
  • All patients received daily oral calcium (1000 t1500mg) and vitamin D (400 t1200 IU) as dietary supplements.
  • Primary end point: % change in total hip BMD at year 9 relative tyear 6 years
  • Secondary end point:
    • Change in hip BMD at years 7 and 8 vs. year 6 and at years 7, 8, and 9 vs. year 0.
    • Incidence of fractures at year 9 relative tyear 6.
    • Change in BMTs at years 7, 8, and 9 relative tyear 6.
    • Safety assessment

Results

Bone Mineral Density

Figure 1: Total Hip BMD from core study baseline tyear 9

 

  • Mean change in total hip BMD from year 6 t9 was −0.54% in Z9 compared with–1.31% in Z6P3 (p=0.183).
  • Compared tcore study baseline (year 0) tyear 9, there was nsignificant difference between the treatments in total hip BMD changes (Z9: 4.6% vs. Z6P3:3.7%) or tyears 7 or 8.
Figure 2: Femoral neck BMD from core study baseline tyear 9

  • Femoral neck BMD changes from year 6 t7-9 did not significantly differ by treatment.
  • Over the 9 years, there was about a 4% increase in femoral neck BMD, which did not differ by E2 treatment at any time point.

Fracture

Figure 3: All clinical fractures

Figure 4: Morphometric Vertebral Fractures

  • The number of fractures was low and did not significantly differ by treatment

Bone Turnover Markers

  •  BTMs showed small, non-significant increases in those whdiscontinued after 6 years compared with those whcontinued for 9 years.

Safety

  • While generally safe, there was a small increase in cardiac arrhythmias (combined serious and non-serious) in the Z9 group but nsignificant imbalance in other safety parameters.

Conclusion

  • Due tminimal additional benefit and rare but possible safety issues, there is little convincing evidence for continuation of annual zoledronic acid administration beyond 6 years.
  • Continued use of Zoledronic acid for up t6 years results in a larger residual effect after it is stopped.
  • All patients whreceive zoledronic acid for 6 years can stop the medication and expect continued benefit for up t3 subsequent years.

Reference

J Bone Miner Res. 2014 Dec 26. [Epub ahead of print] doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2442.