An Analysis of EDICT Study: Insulin Secretion Predicts the Need of Insulin Therapy in New-onset T2DM Patients with Poor Glycemic Control

calendar
28 Jul, 21

Introduction

Amongst type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with poor glycemic control [glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) >10%], the residual ?-cell function influences the response to antidiabetic therapy.

Aim

To identify predictors of response to glucose-lowering therapy in patients with new-onset T2DM and very high HbA1c (>10%) at baseline

Patient Profile

  • Participants from the EDICT (Efficacy and Durability of Initial Combination Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes) study
  • All the study subjects had new onset T2DM (duration <2 years; age 18-75 years), were treatment na?ve and had an initial HbA1c >10%

Methods

Study Design

  • A post hoc analysis of the EDICT study
  • EDICT was an open-label, randomized controlled trial

Treatment Strategy

  • All subjects (N = 104) underwent a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) before treatment initiation
  • Patients were randomized to receive either of the following treatments:
  1. Triple Therapy: Initial triple therapy with metformin, pioglitazone and exenatide (n=49)
  2. Conventional Therapy: Stepwise conventional therapy with metformin (1000 mg/day) followed by glipizide and then insulin glargine to achieve HbA1c <6.5% as follows (n=55):
  1. In case fasting plasma glucose (FPG) at one month was >110 mg/dL or HbA1c was >6.5%, the dose of metformin was increased to 2000 mg/day and glipizide was added at 5 mg/day.
  2. In case FPG was >110 mg/dL or HbA1c was >6.5% at two months, the dose of glipizide was increased to 10 mg/day and then to 20 mg/day.
  3. In case FPG >110 mg/dL or HbA1c >6.5% at three months, glargine insulin was initiated at 10 units before breakfast and escalated weekly by 1-5 units based on the FPG and HbA1c to 60 units/day to maintain FPG at less than <110 mg/dL.

Outcomes

  • Insulin secretion and insulin resistance as calculated based on the OGTT-derived indices

Results

  • The mean baseline HbA1c (11.3% vs. 11.2%), FPG (247 mg/dL vs. 255 mg/dL) and disease duration (3.2 months vs. 4.4 months) did not differ significantly between the conventional and the triple therapy groups.
  • Greater proportion of patients treated with the triple therapy vs. the conventional therapy achieved HbA1c <6.5% at six months (78% vs. 61%), though the difference was statistically insignificant (Table 1).
Table 1: Improvement in HbA1c in the study groups during the study period

Duration

Conventional Group (n=49)

Triple Therapy Group (n=55)

HbA1c at Baseline

11.3%

11.2%

HbA1c at 1 Month

9.4%

9.6%

HbA1c at 3 Months

6.9%

7.3%

HbA1c at 6 Months

6.4%

6.1%

  • Greater proportion of patients in the conventional treatment group rather than those in the triple therapy group required insulin injection (53% vs. 22%; p=0.001)
  • Subjects who achieved the HbA1c goal of <6.5% without insulin therapy had a significantly higher insulin secretion (as measured with ?CPEP0-120) as compared with those who required insulin.
  • Irrespective of the assigned treatment (conventional or triple therapy) and FPG, insulin secretion at baseline was the strongest predictor of subjects who did not require insulin therapy; a cut-off point of CPEP120/CPEP0 (the ratio between plasma C-peptide concentration at 120 minutes during the OGTT and fasting plasma C-peptide concentration) of more than 1.7 predicted subjects who achieved the treatment target without insulin.
  • Furthermore, subjects with a CPEP120/CPEP0 <1.7 and FPG ≤269 mg/dL also achieved the treatment goal with triple therapy, without the need of insulin administration.

Conclusions

  • Nearly two-thirds of the newly diagnosed, drug-na?ve T2DM patients with HbA1c >10% and symptoms of hyperglycemia (such as weight loss), achieved good glycemic control during the study without the need for insulin therapy
  • Insulin secretion in response to a 75-g OGTT predicted the need for insulin therapy at the time of T2DM diagnosis, irrespective of the antidiabetic treatment.
  • A cut-off of 1.7 of CPEP120/CPEP0 is a valuable clinical tool to individualize glucose-lowering therapy in patients with new-onset T2DM and HbA1c >10%.

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021;23:1631–1639.