Efficacy and Safety of Ixekizumab in Children with Active Juvenile Psoriatic Arthritis and Enthesitis Related Arthritis (COSPIRIT-JIA): 16-week Results of a Multicentre, Randomised, Open-label Study

Speaker: Dr. Athimalaipet Ramanan – Bristol Royal Hospital for Children and Translational Health Sciences

Key Highlights:

The COSPIRIT-JIA study, presented by Dr. Ramanan, evaluated the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab, an IL-17A monoclonal antibody, in children with active juvenile psoriatic arthritis (JPsA) and enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA). The 16-week results from this multi-centre, phase 3, randomized, open-label study provided valuable insights into this therapeutic approach for pediatric inflammatory arthritis.

Study Design and Rationale:

  1. Study Design:

  1. Type: Multi-centre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 trial.

  1. Objective: Evaluate safety and efficacy of ixekizumab vs. adalimumab (standard of care).

  1. The first 40 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either ixekizumab (IL-17A blocker) or adalimumab.

  1. Additional patients were recruited to ixekizumab only to explore safety in a larger cohort.

  1. Duration: The study focuses on 16-week initial treatment, with a subset of patients having the option to switch from adalimumab to 4-weekly ixekizumab after 2 years.

  1. Primary Objective:

  1. Evaluate safety and efficacy across two cohorts.

  1. The primary endpoint involves assessing the percentage of participants meeting JIA ACR 30 response at week 16.

  1. Bayesian statistical methods employed, with a posterior probability of ≥80% that 50% or more patients achieve ACR 30.

  1. Methods:

  1. Initial randomization: First 40 patients were split 1:1 to either:

  1. Ixekizumab (IL-17A blocker)

  1. Adalimumab (standard biologic therapy)

  1. Remaining patients were allocated only to ixekizumab to assess its safety and long-term effects.

  1. Adalimumab served as a historical comparator and reference standard given its biosimilar status globally.

  1. Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age groups:

  1. Enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA): Ages 6-18 years.

  1. Juvenile psoriatic arthritis: Ages 2-18 years.

  1. Criteria:

  1. ≥3 active joints.

  1. No requirement for inadequate response to DMARDs or biologics.

  1. Subgroups included both biologic-naïve and bio-refractory patients.

  1. Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with other autoimmune disorders.

  1. Patients with severe comorbidities.

  1. Dosing Regimen:

  1. Adalimumab:

  1. 20 mg for 10–30 kg.

  1. 40 mg for patients >30 kg.

  1. Ixekizumab: Initial loading dose followed by maintenance doses:

  1. 20 mg for 10–25 kg.

  1. 40 mg for 25–50 kg.

  1. 80 mg for patients >50 kg (adult dose).

  1. Endpoints:

  1. Primary Endpoint: Percentage of participants achieving ACR 30 response at week 16.

  1. Secondary Endpoints:

  1. Long-term efficacy parameters.

  1. Safety profile over the study period.

  1. Historical comparisons with adalimumab’s efficacy and response rates.

The baseline demographics showed that recruitment leaned toward psoriatic spondylosis and enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA), with a higher median age observed in these groups. The median age in the adalimumab arm was 13 years, while the bio-naive and bio-experienced ixekizumab groups were older, reflecting a higher proportion of psoriatic spondylosis and ERA. 

Gender distribution was fairly even across groups, with ERA contributing to these trends. Regarding prior DMARD use, only one-third of the adalimumab group had prior synthetic DMARD exposure, while approximately 50% of the ixekizumab bio-naive and bio-experienced groups had such prior exposure, with half of the bio-experienced patients having biologics that were refractory or intolerant.

Efficacy Results:

ACR 30 response at Week 16 by baseline JIA category (NRI)

 

Baseline

JIA Category

ADA Bio-naïve

(N=20)

IXE Bio-naïve

(N=60)

IXE Bio-experienced (N=21)

All IXE

(N=81)

ERA

15/16 (93.8)

37/40 (92.5)

11/14 (78.6)

48/54 (88.9)

JPsA

4/4 (100.0)

17/20 (85.0)

7/7 (100.0)

24/27 (88.9)

All

19/20 (95.0)

54/60 (90.0)

18/21 (85.7)

72/81 (88.9)

 

Importantly, higher response thresholds were also promising:

  • ACR 70: Achieved by approximately two-thirds of ERA patients and half of JPsA patients.

  • ACR 90: Reached by about one-third of ERA and JPsA patients.

  • ACR 100: Attained by roughly one in six ERA and one in four JPsA patients.

Adalimumab showed comparable efficacy within its smaller cohort, aligning with its well-established role in pediatric inflammatory arthritis.

Safety Profile:

  • The safety profile of ixekizumab was consistent with expectations. 

  • Common adverse events included mild to moderate upper respiratory tract infections and nasopharyngitis. 

  • Serious adverse events were limited (e.g., trauma-related acetabular fracture, sinusitis, and tonsillitis) and balanced between treatment arms. No unexpected or severe safety concerns emerged.

Conclusion:

Ixekizumab demonstrated robust efficacy and a favorable safety profile in pediatric patients with JPsA and ERA over 16 weeks, with over 90% achieving ACR 30 responses. 

These findings support ixekizumab as a promising option for managing pediatric inflammatory arthritis, particularly in biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced populations.

American College of Rheumatology Convergence 2024, November 14–19, Washington, D.C.