Ready Reckoner on Severe Asthma and Omalizumab
This ready reckoner is a compilation on the key studies that support the understanding of Severe Asthma and Omalizumab use as an add-on therapy in managing Severe Allergic Asthma. The ready reckoner comprises of key evidences on the disease and effectiveness of Omalizumab in patients
Severe Asthma Registries
|
Study Name |
Objective |
Reference |
N (No. of patients) |
Duration |
Key findings |
|
NHLBI SARP (Severe Asthma Research Program), USA1 |
To improve the understanding of severe asthma to gain a better understanding of asthma and its endotypes, in children and adults, by defining the disease at the molecular and cellular levels, to develop better treatments. |
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2012 |
N=1644 |
10 years |
SARP studies revealed that severe asthma is a heterogeneous disease with varying molecular, biochemical, and cellular inflammatory features and unique structure–function abnormalities. |
|
TENOR (The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma: Outcomes and Treatment Regimens study), USA2 |
To characterize the natural history of disease in adults and children with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma. |
J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2012 |
N= 4756 |
3 years |
High rates of health care use and substantial asthma burden despite receiving multiple long-term controller medications. IgE and allergen sensitization played a role in majority of severe or difficult-to-treat asthmatic patients. Recent exacerbation history was the strongest predictor of future asthma exacerbations. |
|
U-BIOPRED (Unbiased Biomarkers for the Prediction of Respiratory Disease Outcomes), a part of the IMI, EU3 |
To bring about a better understanding of the different types of severe asthma, with the long-term goal of developing more effective treatments for people with the condition. |
Thorax, 2011 |
N=1025 |
5 years |
The U-BIOPRED programme not only reached international consensus on the definition and diagnosis of severe asthma but, more importantly, produced for the first time a stepwise algorithm by which the patient with truly severe refractory asthma may be identified. |
|
ENFUMOSA (European Network for Understanding the Mechanisms of Severe Asthma)4 |
To study of the clinical phenotype of chronic severe asthma. |
Eur Respir J, 2003 |
N=163 |
Retrospective study |
The ENFUMOSA study identified features of Severe Asthma that are distinct from those described for mild-moderate disease. Persistent symptoms and abnormal lung function, despite high-dose regular therapy, accompanied by irreversible airflow obstruction, neutrophilic inflammation, ongoing mediator release and reduced association with atopy. |
Real World Studies
|
Study Name |
Objective |
Reference |
N (No. of patients) |
Duration |
Key findings |
|
The eXpeRience Registry: Real world effectiveness of Omalizumab in allergic asthma 5 |
To evaluate real-world effectiveness, safety and use of Omalizumab therapy in patients with uncontrolled persistent allergic asthma |
Respir Med, 2013 |
N=943 |
2 years |
↓ exacerbations; ↑ asthma control; ↓ symptoms; ↑ lung function (FEV1 ,PEF); ↑ QoL; ↓ healthcare utilization; ↓ use of OCS and rescue medication; 70% with good/excellent response by physician’s GETE |
|
The PERSIST Study: Real-life effectiveness of Omalizumab in patients with severe persistent allergic asthma6 |
To evaluate the 16 – and 52-week effectiveness of add-on Omalizumab treatment under real-life heterogeneity in patients, settings and physicians in patients with severe allergic asthma in Belgium. |
Respir Med, 2009 |
N=158 |
52 weeks |
↓ exacerbations; ↓ symptoms; ↑ FEV1; ↑ QoL; ↓ healthcare utilization; >72% with good/excellent response by physician’s GETE |
|
APEX II Study: Impact of Omalizumab on treatment of Severe Allergic Asthma in UK clinical practice7 |
To describe the impact of Omalizumab on asthma management in adults (16 years and over) treated with Omalizumab as a part of clinical practice within the UK NHS. |
BMJ Open, 2016 |
N=258 |
12-month pre- omalizumab and 12-month post- omalizumab |
↓ exacerbations; ↓ mean daily dose of OCS; ↓ hospital visits due to exacerbations; ↑ FEV1; ↑ asthma- specific patient-reported outcomes |
|
EXCEL Study: Evaluating Clinical Effectiveness and Long-Term Safety in Patients with Moderate to Severe Asthma (EXCELS)8 |
To describe longitudinal changes of asthma control and asthma-related work, school, and activity impairment for patients with moderate-to- severe asthma treated with Omalizumab and those not treated with Omalizumab in a real-world setting. |
Allergy Asthma Proc, 2015 |
N=4930 |
5 years |
↓ asthma-related work, school and activity impairment; ↑ Asthma control (ACT Scores) |
Key Efficacy and Safety Studies
|
Study Name |
Objective |
Reference |
N (No. of patients) |
Duration |
Key findings |
|
INNOVATE9 |
To evaluate the effect of add-on Omalizumab on asthma exacerbations in patients with severe persistent asthma who are inadequately controlled despite GINA step 4 therapy. |
Allergy, 2005 |
N=419 |
28 weeks |
↓ rate of clinically significant exacerbations; ↓ rate of emergency visits; ↑ FEV1; ↑ improved QOL |
|
Effectiveness of Omalizumab in patients with inadequately controlled severe persistent allergic asthma: An open- label study10 |
To assess of the effectiveness of Omalizumab in a subgroup of patients with inadequately controlled severe persistent allergic (IgE-mediated) asthma despite receiving high- dose ICS plus a LABA. |
Repir Med, 2008 |
N=164 |
1 year |
↓ annual exacerbation rate; ↓ annual asthma deterioration- related incident; ↑ % predicted FEV1 ↑asthma symptom scores; ↑ mini AQLQ scores. |
|
Efficacy and tolerability of anti-immunoglobulin E therapy with Omalizumab in patients with poorly controlled (moderate-to- severe) allergic asthma11 |
To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of Omalizumab in patients with poorly controlled, moderate-to-severe allergic asthma. |
Allergy, 2004 |
N=312 |
1 year |
↓ annual asthma deterioration- related incident; ↓ rescue medication use; ↑ FEV1; ↑asthma symptom scores. |
Long-term Studies
|
Study Name |
Objective |
Reference |
N (No. of patients) |
Duration |
Key findings |
|
After 6 years of Xolair; a 3-year withdrawal follow-up12 |
To determine the clinical and immunological state of patients 3 years after a 6-year period of Xolair treatment for severe allergic asthma. |
Allergy, 2010 |
N=18 |
6 years |
Most patients in the study had, still 3 years after closing of 6-year Xolair treatment, showed mild and stable asthma. |
|
Long-term efficacy and safety of Omalizumab in patients with persistent uncontrolled allergic asthma: a systematic review and meta- analysis13 |
To systematically review the evidence regarding (i) long- term efficacy of Omalizumab in patients with persistent uncontrolled allergic asthma (ii) discuss the cost-effectiveness evidence published for Omalizumab in this patient population. |
Sci Rep, 2015 |
6 studies; N=2749 |
52 weeks |
After 52 weeks of treatment with Omalizumab in patients with persistent uncontrolled allergic asthma was accompanied by an acceptable safety profile, but lacked effect on asthma exacerbations. |
|
Long term clinical outcomes of Omalizumab therapy in severe allergic asthma: Study of efficacy and safety14 |
To assess the effectiveness and safety of Omalizumab in a responder population with mean treatment duration of 5 years (range 2-11 years). |
Respir Med, 2017 |
N=45 |
Retrospective study |
↓annual acute asthma- related hospitalization rate; ↓ daily mean maintenance OCS dose; improvement in ACQ score; ↑ FEV1; ↓ no. of work/school missed days. |
Efficacy and Safety in Paediatric Population
|
Study Name |
Objective |
Reference |
N (No. of patients) |
Duration |
Key findings |
|
Long-term safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of Omalizumab in children with severe uncontrolled asthma15 |
To evaluate the long- term safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic of Omalizumab in children with uncontrolled severe asthma. |
Allergology International, 2017 |
N=35 |
16 weeks+ Treatment till approval for paediatric indication |
↑QOL scores; ↑ annual rate of hospitalization and ER visits; well-tolerated with no new safety risks in children. |
|
Add-on Omalizumab in children with severe allergic asthma: a 1-year real life survey16 |
To evaluate Omalizumab efficacy and safety in a real- life setting in severe asthmatic children. |
Eur Respir J, 2013 |
N=104 |
1 year |
↑ Asthma control; ↓exacerbation and hospitalization rate; ↓ ICS dose; ↑ FEV1; well-tolerated. |
Efficacy and Safety in Elderly Population
|
Study Name |
Objective |
Reference |
N (No. of patients) |
Duration |
Key findings |
|
Evaluation of long-term safety and efficacy of Omalizumab in elderly patients with uncontrolled allergic asthma17 |
To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of the anti-IgE antibody Omalizumab in elderly (aged ≥65 years) patients with uncontrolled allergic asthma. |
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 2016 |
N=19 |
Retrospective study |
No significantly important adverse event experienced; safe and effective for elderly population. |
Indian Evidence
|
Study Name |
Objective |
Reference |
N (No. of patients) |
Duration |
Key findings |
|
Efficacy and Safety of Omalizumab In Everyday Clinical Practice in Patients with Allergic (IgE- Mediated) Asthma in India: An Interim Analysis18 |
To evaluate the outcomes in real-world practice in a 28-week interim analysis of a 52-week observational study of Omalizumab in patients with allergic asthma in India. |
Am J Respir Crit Care Med 187;2013: A1285 |
N=129 |
28 weeks |
↓exacerbations and hospitalizations; ↓ missed work/college days; ↓ ICS dose; ↑ FEV1 |
|
EASE: Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Xolair (Omalizumab) in IgE mediated asthma19 |
To evaluate the outcomes in real-world practice in a 28-week interim analysis of a 52-week observational study of Omalizumab in patients with allergic asthma in India. |
ERS Congress; 2013 |
N=100 |
28 weeks |
↓ Exacerbations; ↑ FEV1; ↑ACT scores; ↓ ICS dose |
References
1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012; 185(4): 356–362.
2. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012; 130:332-42.
3. Thorax. 2011; 66: 910-917.
4. Eur Respir J. 2003; 22: 470–477.
5. Respir Med. 2013; 107: 1141-1151.
6. Respir Med. 2009; 103, 1633-1642.
7. BMJ Open. 2016; 6: e011857.
8. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2015; 36 (4): 283-92.
9. Allergy. 2005: 60: 309–316.
10. Respir Med. 2008; 102, 1371-1378.
11. Allergy. 2004; 59(7):701-708.
12. Allergy. 2010; 65: 56–60.
13. Sci Rep. 2015; 5: 8191; DOI: 10.1038/srep08191.
14. Respir Med. 2017; 124: 36-43.
15. Allergology International. 2017; 66: 106-115.
16. Eur Respir J. 2013; 42: 1224–1233.
17. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016: 5117: 546-549.
18. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 187; 2013: A1285.
19. P907, Abstract presented at European Respiratory society congress, 2013.






