In-vitro Efficacy of Cefepime/Enmetazobactam Against ESBL and ampC Isolates from India
Introduction
ESBL and ampC-producing Enterobacterales pose significant treatment challenges, reducing the effectiveness of conventional beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) combinations like piperacillin/tazobactam. Cefepime/enmetazobactam, a novel BL/BLI combination, is designed to restore cefepime activity and serve as a carbapenem-sparing therapy.
Aim
To evaluate the in-vitro activity of cefepime/enmetazobactam along with comparators against molecularly characterized third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa isolates from India.
Methods
Isolates:
- Non-duplicate third generation cephalosporin resistant Enterobacterales (E. coli, n = 262; K. pneumoniae, n = 250; Enterobacter sp., n = 32; Proteus spp., n = 22) and P. aeruginosa (n = 100)
Assessments
- MIC testing by broth microdilution
- Time-kill assay for bactericidal activity
- Genes detected by PCR:
- Extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs): CTX-M, TEM, SHV
- ampCs (CMY, DHA)
- OXA-1
- carbapenemases
Results
- Molecular characterisation of isolates:
A significant proportion of isolates carried multiple resistance genes
Table 1: Molecular Profile of Isolates
|
Species |
Key Findings |
|
E. coli |
58% CTX-M producers; 42% co-harbored CTX-M + OXA-1; 62% ampC producers (CMY, DHA, dual) |
|
K. pneumoniae |
100% CTX-M; 13% OXA-1; 5 isolates with ampC (CMY/DHA) |
|
Enterobacter spp. |
All CTX-M positive |
|
Proteus spp. |
All CTX-M positive |
- MIC Distribution and Susceptibility
Cefepime/enmetazobactam demonstrated potent inhibition across species:
- All E. coli CTX-M ± OXA-1 isolates inhibited at MIC ≤ 2 mg/L; ampC producers at MIC ≤ 4 mg/L
- K. pneumoniae CTX-M isolates inhibited at MIC ≤ 1 mg/L; limited activity against OXA-48-like producers (16% susceptible)
- 100% inhibition for Enterobacter spp. and Proteus spp. at low MICs
- P. aeruginosa showed complete susceptibility
Table 2: Susceptibility comparison of cefepime/enmetazobactam with Piperacillin/tazobactam
|
Pathogen |
Cefepime/Enmetazobactam (MIC) |
Piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) Susceptibility |
|
E. coli (CTX-M ± OXA-1) |
≤ 2 mg/L (100% inhibited) |
78% → 58% with OXA-1 |
|
E. coli (ampC) |
≤ 4 mg/L (100% inhibited) |
Poor activity |
|
K. pneumoniae (CTX-M) |
≤ 1 mg/L (100% inhibited) |
Variable |
|
K. pneumoniae (OXA-48-like) |
Limited activity (16% ≤ 4 mg/L) |
Poor activity |
|
Enterobacter spp. |
≤ 2 mg/L (100% inhibited) |
71.8% |
|
Proteus spp. |
≤ 0.25 mg/L (100% inhibited) |
100% |
|
P. aeruginosa |
100% susceptible |
88% |
- Time Kill Assay
Cefepime/enmetazobactam achieved rapid bactericidal activity:
- ≥3 log₁₀ kill against ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates
- Comparable killing effect to carbapenems; superior to TZP in resistant isolates
Table 3: Time Kill Assay Results
|
Isolate Type |
Cefepime/Enmetazobactam Kill |
Comparison |
|
E. coli (CTX-M + OXA-1) |
≥ 3 log₁₀ kill |
Comparable to carbapenem |
|
E. coli (CTX-M + CMY) |
≥ 3 log₁₀ kill |
Comparable to carbapenem |
|
K. pneumoniae (CTX-M + OXA-1) |
≥ 3 log₁₀ kill |
Comparable to carbapenem |
|
K. pneumoniae (CTX-M + CMY) |
≥ 3 log₁₀ kill |
Comparable to carbapenem |
- Comparative Potency
Cefepime/enmetazobactam showed dramatically lower MIC90 values compared to TZP:
- MIC90 for E. coli and K. pneumoniae: 1 mg/L
- TZP MIC90 for E. coli and K. pneumoniae: 128 mg/L (indicating poor activity)
Conclusion
Spectrum of coverage for cefepime/enmetazobactam was superior to that of TZP and similar to that of meropenem, emphasising the importance of cefepime/ enmetazobactam as a carbapenem-sparing option for severe infections in regions with high ESBL prevalence.
Reference
Diagnostic Microbiology & Infectious Disease. 2025;113:116993








