In-vitro Efficacy of Cefepime/Enmetazobactam Against ESBL and ampC Isolates from India

calendar
23 Dec, 25

Introduction

ESBL and ampC-producing Enterobacterales pose significant treatment challenges, reducing the effectiveness of conventional beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) combinations like piperacillin/tazobactam. Cefepime/enmetazobactam, a novel BL/BLI combination, is designed to restore cefepime activity and serve as a carbapenem-sparing therapy.

Aim

To evaluate the in-vitro activity of cefepime/enmetazobactam along with comparators against molecularly characterized third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa isolates from India.

Methods

Isolates: 

  • Non-duplicate third generation cephalosporin resistant Enterobacterales (E. coli, n = 262; K. pneumoniae, n = 250; Enterobacter sp., n = 32; Proteus spp., n = 22) and P. aeruginosa (n = 100) 

Assessments

  • MIC testing by broth microdilution 
  • Time-kill assay for bactericidal activity
  • Genes detected by PCR: 
    1. Extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs): CTX-M, TEM, SHV
    2. ampCs (CMY, DHA)
    3. OXA-1
    4. carbapenemases

Results

  1. Molecular characterisation of isolates:

A significant proportion of isolates carried multiple resistance genes

Table 1: Molecular Profile of Isolates

Species

Key Findings

E. coli

58% CTX-M producers; 42% co-harbored CTX-M + OXA-1; 62% ampC producers (CMY, DHA, dual)

K. pneumoniae

100% CTX-M; 13% OXA-1; 5 isolates with ampC (CMY/DHA)

Enterobacter spp.

All CTX-M positive

Proteus spp.

All CTX-M positive

  1. MIC Distribution and Susceptibility

Cefepime/enmetazobactam demonstrated potent inhibition across species:

  • All E. coli CTX-M ± OXA-1 isolates inhibited at MIC ≤ 2 mg/L; ampC producers at MIC ≤ 4 mg/L
  • K. pneumoniae CTX-M isolates inhibited at MIC ≤ 1 mg/L; limited activity against OXA-48-like producers (16% susceptible)
  • 100% inhibition for Enterobacter spp. and Proteus spp. at low MICs
  • P. aeruginosa showed complete susceptibility

 

Table 2: Susceptibility comparison of cefepime/enmetazobactam with Piperacillin/tazobactam

Pathogen

Cefepime/Enmetazobactam (MIC)

Piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) Susceptibility

E. coli (CTX-M ± OXA-1)

≤ 2 mg/L (100% inhibited)

78% → 58% with OXA-1

E. coli (ampC)

≤ 4 mg/L (100% inhibited)

Poor activity

K. pneumoniae (CTX-M)

≤ 1 mg/L (100% inhibited)

Variable

K. pneumoniae (OXA-48-like)

Limited activity (16% ≤ 4 mg/L)

Poor activity

Enterobacter spp.

≤ 2 mg/L (100% inhibited)

71.8%

Proteus spp.

≤ 0.25 mg/L (100% inhibited)

100%

P. aeruginosa

100% susceptible

88%

 

  1. Time Kill Assay

Cefepime/enmetazobactam achieved rapid bactericidal activity:

  • ≥3 log₁₀ kill against ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates
  • Comparable killing effect to carbapenems; superior to TZP in resistant isolates

Table 3: Time Kill Assay Results

Isolate Type

Cefepime/Enmetazobactam Kill

Comparison

E. coli (CTX-M + OXA-1)

≥ 3 log₁₀ kill

Comparable to carbapenem

E. coli (CTX-M + CMY)

≥ 3 log₁₀ kill

Comparable to carbapenem

K. pneumoniae (CTX-M + OXA-1)

≥ 3 log₁₀ kill

Comparable to carbapenem

K. pneumoniae (CTX-M + CMY)

≥ 3 log₁₀ kill

Comparable to carbapenem

 

  1. Comparative Potency

Cefepime/enmetazobactam showed dramatically lower MIC90 values compared to TZP:

  • MIC90 for E. coli and K. pneumoniae: 1 mg/L
  • TZP MIC90 for E. coli and K. pneumoniae: 128 mg/L (indicating poor activity)

Conclusion

Spectrum of coverage for cefepime/enmetazobactam was superior to that of TZP and similar to that of meropenem, emphasising the importance of cefepime/ enmetazobactam as a carbapenem-sparing option for severe infections in regions with high ESBL prevalence.

Reference

Diagnostic Microbiology & Infectious Disease. 2025;113:116993