AMBER and EMERALD Trial: 96-week Resistance Analysis of Once-daily Single Tablet Regimen of D/C/F/TAF in HIV-1 Adults Patients
Introduction
AMBER and EMERALD are two Phase 3, multicentre, randomized, active-controlled non-inferiority trials
Aim
To analyse the baseline resistance and post-baseline resistance data in all patients with week 96 protocol-defined virologic failure (PDVF) and PDVR in AMBER and EMERALD study respectively.
Patient Profile
AMBER Study: ART-naïve adults with screening plasma VL ≥1000 copies/mL, CD4+ count >50 cells/mm3 and HIV-1 with genotypic sensitivity to darunavir, emtricitabine and tenofovir.
EMERALD Study: ART-experienced adults who were virologically suppressed (VL 50 copies/ml for ≥2 months before screening) while on a stable bPI plus F/TDF regimen for ≥6 months
Methods
bPI=boosted protease inhibitor
· Protocol-defined virologic failure (PDVF): PDVF was defined as:
o virologic nonresponse (VL <1 log10 reduction from baseline and ≥50 copies/mL at week 8, confirmed at next visit) or
o virologic rebound (confirmed VL ≥50 copies/mL after confirmed, consecutive VL <50 copies/mL or confirmed VL >1 log10 increase from the nadir) and/or viremia at the final time point (VL ≥400 copies/mL at study endpoint or study discontinuation after week 8)
· Protocol-defined virologic rebound (PDFVR) defined as cumulative confirmed VL ≥50 copies/mL or premature discontinuation with last VL ≥50 copies/mL) and VL ≥400 copies/mL at failure (confirmed or unconfirmed), or at later time points, including patients who discontinued with a last single VL ≥400 copies/mL
Results
· No resistance mutations related to the study drugs were observed
· No darunavir, primary protease inhibitor or tenofovir resistance-associated-mutations (RAMs) occurred post-baseline in 1,125 patients continuing the once-daily, STR (D/C/F/TAF) or in 715 patients switching to D/C/F/TAF
· The emtricitabine RAM, M184I/V, was detected in only one patient in each arm of AMBER.
· PDVR mainly consisted of low-level and transient viremia
o four patients in the D/C/F/TAF arm and two in the control arm with confirmed rebound ≥200 copies/mL through 96 weeks
· Patients with prior virologic failure and baseline genoarchive data who received D/C/F/TAF, baseline archived darunavir, emtricitabine and tenofovir RAMs, including those with predicted antiretroviral resistance, did not preclude virologic response.
Conclusion
· High virologic response and low virologic failure rates were observed with the D/C/F/TAF once-daily STR through Week 96
· D/C/F/TAF provides a convenient treatment option by combining the efficacy and high barrier to resistance of darunavir with the safety advantages of TAF, all in a single-tablet regimen for ART-naïve and -experienced adults living with HIV-1, even in those with virus harbouring archived resistance to study drugs at baseline.
Reference
J Med Virol.2021;93;6:3985-3990






