Efficacy and Safety of Cefixime in Children with Community-acquired Infections

calendar
14 Sep, 20

Introduction

Cefixime is a potent broad-spectrum antibiotic with a variety of indications.

Aim

To evaluate the clinical efficacy, bacteriological eradication rates and tolerability of cefixime in children with community-acquired upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), lower RTI (LRTI) and uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTI)

Patient Profile

  •  Patients, aged 6 months to 28 years, of both sexes, with a diagnosis of community-acquired URTI, LRTI and UTI

Methods

  •  Prospective, randomized, open, noncomparative

Efficacy Assessment. The primary outcome measures were:

1. Bacteriological and clinical response of signs and symptoms of URTI, LRTI and UTI, determined at the end of therapy

2. Physician Global evaluation of patient condition (using a 5-point scale):

1 = Excellent

2 = Very Good

3 = Good

4 = Fair

5 = Poor.

Clinical outcome: Clinical cure (defined as a complete resolution of signs and symptoms); Improved (if clinical signs & symptoms diminished, but did not completely resolve); Failure (if the signs and symptoms worsened, persisted or reappeared).

Safety assessment: Patients were closely monitored for adverse clinical events. The severity of clinically adverse events was categorized as: mild, moderate, or severe. The adverse reactions were classified as: probably drug-related, possibly drug-related, not drug-related, or with an unknown relationship to the study drug

Results

  • All isolates were susceptible to cefixime
Table1:  Etiological agents in patients with AOM, Acute sinusitis, LRTI and uncomplicated UTI

 

Number of patients (%)

AOM

 

Streptococcus pneumonia

17 (56.66%)

Pseudomonas spp

4(13.33%)

Staph. aureus

5 (16.67%)

Moraxella catarrhalis

2(6.67%)

E. coli

2(6.67 %)

Acute Sinusitis

 

Streptococcus pneumoniae

4 (33.33%)

Moraxella

catarrhalis

3 (16.7%)

Staph. aureus

2 (16.7)

mixed

flora with Staph. aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae

1 (8.33%)

LRTI

 

Streptococcus pneumoniae

4

Haemophilus influenzae

1

Uncomplicated UTI

 

E. coli

17 (48.6%)

Proteus spp.

7 (20%)

Klebsiela

3(8.6%)

Staph.aureus

3(8.6%)

Pseudomonas

1(2.86%)

Ecoli+Enterobacter

2(5.7%)

Klebsiela+Enterobac

2(5.7%)

 

  • Cefixime treatment was successful in 100% patients suffering from acute otitis media (AOM), in 83.3% patients with acute sinusitis, in 100% patients with pneumonia, in 88.57% patients with uncomplicated UTI
Figure 2: Clinical outcome of patients treated with cefixime

Table 2: Physician’s global evaluation of patient condition at the end of treatment (using a 5-point scale)

 

AOM

(%)

Acute

sinusitis (%)

LRTI (%)

UTI (%)

General

(%)

Excellent

30

(83.33)

12

(58.34)

12 (66.67)

35

(71.43)

89

(73.034)

Very good

30

(10.0)

12

(16.67)

12 (16.67)

35

(11.42)

89

(13.48)

Good

30

(6.67)

12

(8.33)

12 (16.67)

35

(5.71)

89

(7.86)

Fair

0

12

(8.33)

0

35

(5.71)

89 (3.37)

Poor

0

12

(8.33)

0

35

(5.71)

89

(3.37)

Total

30

(100%)

12

(100.0)

12 (100%)

35

(100.0%)

89 (100.0)

Safety

  • Cefixime was a well-tolerated and safe drug with general side effects evidenced in 3.48% (3 pts), without severe reactions
  • Side-effects were transient and disappeared after finishing therapy in all three of the cases
Table 2: Safety results in cefixime treated patients

Side-effects

General

%

Mild

89 (2)

2.25

Moderate

89 (1)

1.23

Severe

89 (0)

0.0

Total

89 (3)

3.48

Conclusion

  • Cefixime demonstrated
    • Good efficiency in patients with community-acquired infections suffering from AOM, LRTI and in UTI
    • Excellent compliance from the patients and parents to the protocol of cefixime in the treatment of AOM, LRTI, and UTI.
  • Cefixime was well tolerated, and there was no need of therapy discontinuation
  • The study suggested that in cases of acute infections where Staphylococcus aureus is a suspected pathogen, cefixime is not recommended as therapy and needs to be replaced with another antibiotic, according to susceptibility at the antibiogram.

Reference

Prilozi. 2011;32(2):143-155.